The things we Baby Boomers were destined to accomplish! We would be the generation that would usher in cheap, clean nuclear power! We would be driving flying cars by 2000! And we would take the lead in adopting the efficient, easy-to-use metric system!
OK, enough with the exclamation points already. Obviously, all three of these particular dreams were overblown.
However, it may surprise you to know just how close we are to being a metric nation. Read on.
It all started by those lovable masters of illogic, the French, who decided we needed a logical system of measurement. According to metric scholar Pat Naughin:
The metric system used all around the world has three parts. In France in the 1790s, it was named the "decimal metric system". The system part came from John Wilkins in England, the metric part came from Burattini in Italy, and the decimal part came from the USA. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington were very active in getting the French "philosophes' to use decimal numbers for the "decimal metric system".
OK, raise your hand if you knew that our founding fathers were part of the team behind the metric system. THIS history buff didn't!
During the 60's, Great Britain, Australia, and Canada all began a systematic conversion to the same system that most other countries had officially adopted: the metric system. This left the US, Liberia and Burma still using the English Imperial units. Thus, talk began spreading among legislators,educators, and manufacturers about switching over.
The depicted 1971 Sunday comics cartoon, which will expand into the entire original panel if you click on it, showed that there was really no choice in the matter. Go metric, or lose every economic and intellectual advantage you have over the rest of the world.
Thus, the metric system began being taught to us Boomer kids in schools.
At this point, it would be good to point out that pharmaceutical manufacturers had been using the metric system since early in the 20th century. So had much of the tooling industry. When it came to teeny tiny amounts, it just made more sense to them to use grams and millimeters.
But it was in the 70's that many others followed suit. For example, food manufacturers. Cereal boxes began being sold in metric weights, with the standard weight in parentheses. The implication was that the METRIC system was the preferred one.
The liquor industry was an eager adopter. I know that by the time I could legally purchase hootch in 1980, the half-gallon, fifth, and pint were gone, replaced by their metric equivalents. Wine was sold in metric quantities as well. Interestingly, the working man's preferred libation, beer, stubbornly resisted change.
Indeed, it was stubborn resistance by the working stiffs among us (including, for the longest time, ME) that kept the US from jumping in headlong with the rest of the world and becoming an official metric nation. We cringed at the sight of kilometers on our speed limit signs. We rolled our eyes at temperatures given in Celsius. We were disgusted when our SAE wrenches that we might have inherited from our fathers and grandfathers no longer fit these newfangled nuts and bolts on our cars.
The depicted flyer, published in Singapore in the 70's, shows an approach that might have made the transition easier. Children, teach your parents the metric system!
But instead, we tended as a generation to agree that our feet, pounds, miles, and gallons were just fine, thank you.
However, the metric system continued to be adopted despite our indifference and/or opposition. Our American-made cars began to sport speedometers that read in both MPH and KPH. Some gas stations extended the functionality of their old two-digit-price-limited pumps during the Arab oil embargo of 1973 by marketing the now-expensive stuff as liters. The Olympics turned us into begrudging experts into what constituted a meter, a kilogram, or a kilometer. Domestic cars even began to be manufactured with metric bolts.
That brings us to today. The US continues to be one of three blips on the world map that are still officially non-metric. But in reality, we are as much, or even more so, metric than some official countries. It just doesn't say so on our company letterhead.
One last thing: for an inaccurate, but close enough, conversion from Celsius to Fahrenheit, just double the number and add thirty. Thus, 30 degrees Celsius becomes 90 degrees "Americun". Actually, it's 86 degrees, but at least you know it's HOT!

Comments (6)
I also think part of what has delayed the metric system is that car manufacturers and other similar industries saw the cost of a complete tool changeover as very negative. The benefits did not seem to outweigh the costs. So they plowed merrily along with SAE.
The metric system is one of those things I do not really care about. I like the idea of a base 10 system. But . . . a tenth of a meter is not a useful length of measure.
A foot is much more practical and useful for many dimensions. A cubit was near to that length. a decimeter is just too small.
But feet and yards conflict for while both are useful, they do not accommodate each other well. I would say ditch the meter, and call a foot a meter and divide it into 10 pieces.
But that's all too late now and it does not solve whether there is really any ultimate gains from a switch.
And I am still waiting on my flying car.
Posted by Scott Irv | June 1, 2009 1:08 AM
Posted on June 1, 2009 01:08
A few years ago US taxpayers paid a pretty big price for failure to fully "metricize" when a Mars Lander "landed" with a thud due to a mix up between metric and US values in computing the trajectory / landing speed for the craft.
I believe one of the biggest obstacles / (invalid) arguments is the people who want to make precise conversions for everyday uses. You know, like 35 miles = 56.33 kilometers as if they actually deal with that kind of precision in their daily lives. The speed limit sign you show at the top of the article is a great response to those folks.
BTW, you can think of one foot as about 1/3 of a meter. 8^)
Posted by Old Salt | June 1, 2009 10:01 AM
Posted on June 1, 2009 10:01
As a Brit(born 1942), I have been forced to use metric systems for many years but the one thing I have never been able to fully adapt to Celsius and still think and talk in Fahrenheit.
The other problem I have when in the USA is the difference in pints and gallons to the UK version .- I always feel shortchanged when buying a pint of beer in the states and only receiving 16fl oz instead of 20 fl oz :)
Also have to remember that American cars get fewer miles to the Gallon than British cars :)
Posted by ukjerryatrick | June 9, 2009 7:28 AM
Posted on June 9, 2009 07:28
"One last thing: for an inaccurate, but close enough, conversion from Celsius to Fahrenheit, just double the number and add thirty. Thus, 30 degrees Celsius becomes 90 degrees "Americun". Actually, it's 86 degrees, but at least you know it's HOT!"
A simple way to get the exact conversion is to double the Celsius value, subtract 10% from that and add 32. So 30C is 60-6=54 plus 32 equals the 86 exact value.
Posted by Michael | June 13, 2009 10:53 PM
Posted on June 13, 2009 22:53
What many (most? almost all?) folks don't realize is that the US "Imperial" system is based on the metric system. That is, we actually are officially metric, but we have an overlay to traditional units. Example from wikipedia: Effective July 1, 1959, the United States and countries of the British Commonwealth defined the length of the international yard to be 0.9144 meters. Consequently, the international inch is defined to be equal to 25.4 millimeters.
Posted by Fred | June 22, 2009 7:34 PM
Posted on June 22, 2009 19:34
Scott:
"A foot is much more practical and useful for many dimensions. A cubit was near to that length."
You must be really small :) A cubit is generally considered to be the length of the forearm; Wikipedia lists the shortest at 18 inches. I wouldn't think something one and a half times the size of something else as "near to" the same size.
Posted by Barc | July 27, 2009 9:54 AM
Posted on July 27, 2009 09:54